Back to Lobbyist Page

 

 

AMESTOY CONSULTING, LLC

10 Reeders Village Drive

Helena, Montana 59601

Phone/Fax 406-443-2370

March 18, 2007

LOBBYIST ACTIVITY REPORT

2007 LEGISLATIVE SESSION

WEEK ELEVEN

(March 11, 2007 – March 17, 2007)

 

 

During Week Eleven of the 2007 Legislative Session, I provided testimony on the following proposed legislation:

 

HB 269: "AN ACT REVISING LAWS RELATING TO WEEDS; REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN OWNER SELLING PROPERTY PROVIDE NOTICE THAT THERE IS THE POTENTIAL EXISTENCE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS; PROVIDING THAT A COUNTY WEED BOARD MAY ESTABLISH EMBARGOES; CLARIFYING STATUTES REGARDING THE CREATION OF A NOXIOUS WEED FUND IN EACH COUNTY; REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT AN INTEGRATED NOXIOUS WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH STATE AGENCIES BE FOR 6 YEARS; REMOVING THE REDUNDANT STATUTE REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS AND TAXES FOR THE WEED DISTRICT; PROVIDING A TRANSFER OF FUNDS; AMENDING SECTIONS 7-22-2116, 7-22-2126, 7-22-2142, AND 7-22-2151, MCA; AND REPEALING SECTIONS 7-22-2149 AND 77-6-114, MCA; AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES."

 

This proposed legislation provided for some clarifications to eliminate redundancies in the above outlined sections of the statute.  In addition, the Noxious Week Trust Fund would be increased by $5 million of General Funds bringing the total amount of the Trust Fund to $10 million.  I supported this proposed legislation.

 

 

SB 541: "AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE MONTANA FACILITY FINANCE AUTHORITY TO FINANCE CERTAIN PROJECTS FOR FOR-PROFIT OR NONPROFIT CORPORATIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS; PROVIDING FOR TAXATION OF THOSE PROJECTS; AMENDING SECTIONS 90-7-102 AND 90-7-104, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."

 

            This proposed legislation would allow funds from the Montana Facility Finance Authority to be used for FOR-PROFIT organizations as well as Non-Profit Organizations. If these funds were used to finance FOR-PROFIT Organizations these organizations would be taxed at the appropriate rate.

 

            The passage of this proposed legislation would provide another funding source for For- Profit businesses to utilize.  I provided testimony in support of this proposed legislation.

 

HB 304: "AN ACT CREATING THE WATER POLICY INTERIM COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR AGENCY OVERSIGHT RESEARCH AND STUDY ON WATER-RELATED ISSUES FOR CERTAIN AGENCIES; REQUIRING THAT CERTAIN WATER RIGHT REPORTS AND UPDATES BE PROVIDED TO THE WATER POLICY INTERIM COMMITTEE; PROVIDING AN APPROPRIATION; AMENDING SECTIONS SECTION 5-5-202, 75-1-324, 85-1-203, 85-1-621, 85-2-105, 85-2-281, 85-2-350, AND 85-2-436, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE AND A TERMINATION DATE."

 

This proposed legislation would authorize the formation of an Interim Committee to study the following water issues: “The water policy interim committee shall conduct a detailed analysis and study of issues related to water quantity, water quality, and water use in Montana. The study must include the following issues at a minimum:

(a) Surface water and ground water in closed basins and mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge, including:

(i) Review and summary of current Montana law related to mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge;

(ii) Analysis of other states' laws and rules related to mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge and the other states' experiences with applying and using mitigation, augmentation, and aquifer recharge;

(iii) Comparison of mitigation, augmentation, and aquifer recharge options and alternatives for applying the concepts in Montana water law;

(iv) Analysis and determination of water quality testing requirements to ensure that the use of mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge does not adversely affect ground water quality;

(v) Analysis of data developed to determine the type and amount of research, data, and analysis necessary to develop a scientifically defensible hydrogeologic assessment to be used in making informed decisions with regard to mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge activity in Montana;

(vi) Appropriate monitoring requirements to determine the effectiveness of mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge plans; and

(vii) Other issues related to mitigation, augmentation, or aquifer recharge in Montana to facilitate continued economic development and growth while providing reasonable protections to senior appropriators and water quality of surface and ground water resources;

(b) Methods for the management of water, particularly in closed basins, to ensure compliance with closed basin law, including:

(i) Artificial recharge of ground water, including but not limited to alternatives such as aquifer storage and recovery;

(ii) Identifying research necessary, if any, to determine alternatives and options for conducting water management through artificial recharge of ground water; and

(iii) Conducting a water quality analysis associated with storage or introduction of surface water to ground water resources;

(c) Determining an appropriate, accurate, and time- efficient process for coordinating water quality requirements with the water appropriations process by:

(i) Determining how the department of environmental quality and the department of natural resources and conservation are issuing permits that affect ground water or surface water quality and whether or not the water appropriation process and the water quality process are coordinated;

(ii) Ensuring that a detailed process is outlined that provides potential applicants with a clear process that must be followed to ensure that prior appropriators and water quality in both surface water and ground water are protected while allowing development in Montana; and

(iii) Identifying the extent to which cumulative impacts are analyzed from a water quantity and a water quality perspective and whether or not the two findings are assessed jointly and determining the appropriate level of coordination;

(d) Wells that are exempt from the permitting process pursuant to 85-2-306, including:

(i) A detailed reporting of the number of exempt wells currently in Montana and an estimate of the number of exempt wells expected to be developed by 2020;

(ii) A determination and summary of the types of beneficial uses to which water from exempt wells is applied;

(iii) A determination of the hydrogeologic analysis necessary to determine consumptive use on a per-acre or fraction of an acre basis and on a per-use basis;

(iv) An analysis of the amount of water reasonably necessary for the various beneficial uses and a comparison of this reasonable use standard with current statutory limits, including volume, flow rate, and other criteria that the committee determines are necessary to provide for accurate and adequate measurement of water use through exempt wells;

(v) Options and alternatives for enforcing statutory limitations regarding exempt well usage; and

(vi) A determination of the necessity and reasons for providing a process that is exempt from the permitting process;

(e) An analysis of water marketing and water reallocation options available in Montana, including:

(i) Leasing water rights, water banking, water trading, and water sales;

(ii) The lease-to-sale ratio of water rights in Montana;

(iii) The number of market purchases that have been completed in Montana;

(iv) The purposes for which water trades or sales have taken place;

(v) The feasibility of creating and operating a water bank in Montana; and

(vi) The administrative procedures and costs that would be necessary to establish and operate water bank in Montana.

(3) The committee shall gather appropriate information that the committee determines is necessary to make sound and well-reasoned policy decisions to guide the management and use of Montana’s ground water resource into the future, including but not limited to:

(a) Identifying gaps in data necessary to determine appropriate locations to conduct artificial recharge of ground water; and

(b) Presenting long-term goals and policy proposals for water management related to ground water resources.

(4) The committee shall prepare a report to submit to the 61st legislature that provides clear policy direction and necessary legislation to guide Montana’s water policy and that ensures fair and reasonable use of Montana’s water resource as demands on water increase while supplies remain the same or decrease.

 

            There was a considerable amount of discussion concerning the ability of an Interim Study Committee to actually be able to complete the very ambitious study items listed above. I monitored this proposed legislation.

 

 

HB 286: "AN ACT REVISING INCENTIVES UNDER THE BIG SKY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO ASSIST HIGH-POVERTY COUNTIES IN WORKFORCE TRAINING AND OTHER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES; AMENDING SECTIONS 90-1-201, 90-1-202, AND 90-1-204, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." 

 

As defined in the proposed legislation, a "High-poverty county" means a county in this state in which 14% or more of people of all ages are in poverty as determined by the U.S. bureau of the census estimates for the most current year available.” Under this definition, Richland County does not qualify as a high-poverty county.  Richland County’s poverty rate is at 12.4%. I monitored this proposed legislation.

 

 

HB 337: "AN ACT AUTHORIZING A COUNTY, A CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, OR A MUNICIPALITY TO ESTABLISH A VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS' DISABILITY INSURANCE ACCOUNT; AUTHORIZING A COUNTY, A CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, OR A MUNICIPALITY TO LEVY A TAX, SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVAL, ON PROPERTY TO PURCHASE DISABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS; LIMITING THE PAYMENT OF DISABILITY INSURANCE BENEFITS TO CERTAIN VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS; AMENDING SECTIONS 7-33-2109, 7-33-2209, 7-33-2403, 7-33-4109, 7-33-4111, AND 39-71-118, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE."

 

The purpose of this proposed legislation is self-explanatory. I monitored this proposed legislation.

 

           

SB 549: "AN ACT REVISING THE METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING LAND AS AGRICULTURAL FOR PROPERTY TAX PURPOSES; REQUIRING A MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT OF GROSS INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION TO QUALIFY AS CLASS THREE AGRICULTURAL LAND; PROVIDING THAT THE MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR GRAZING LAND BE DETERMINED BY AN ANIMAL UNIT MONTH COMPUTATION DETERMINED BY MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-BOZEMAN; AMENDING SECTION 15-7-202, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE AND A RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY DATE."

 

            The purpose of this proposed legislation is self-explanatory. I monitored this proposed legislation.

 

           

SB 550: "AN ACT REVISING THE LAWS GOVERNING LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDY COMMISSIONS; AUTHORIZING THE IMPOSITION OF A MILL LEVY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EXCEPTION FROM THE MILL LEVY LIMITS FOR A LEVY FOR FUNDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDY COMMISSIONS; CLARIFYING THE PROCEDURES FOR PROPOSALS FOR ALTERNATIVE FORMS OR PLANS OF GOVERNMENT MADE BY PETITION OR BY A STUDY COMMISSION; PROVIDING THAT ELECTED OFFICIALS REMAIN IN OFFICE UNLESS THE NEW FORM OR PLAN ELIMINATES THE OFFICE FOR WHICH THEY WERE ELECTED; AND AMENDING SECTIONS 7-3-122, 7-3-141, 7-3-142, 7-3-149, 7-3-151, 7-3-152, 7-3-153, 7-3-155, 7-3-156, 7-3-157, 7-3-160, 7-3-161, 7-3-175, 7-3-178, 7-3-184, 7-3-187, 7-3-192, 7-3-193, AND 15-10-420, MCA."

 

            The main purpose of this proposed legislation was to provide for a funding mechanism for financing a Local Government Study Commission, if the local government determined that a Study Commission needed to be formed.  I monitored this proposed legislation.