AMESTOY CONSULTING, LLC
2009
LEGISLATIVE SESSION
WEEK THREE
(January
18 – January 24, 2009)
During
Week Three of the 2009 Legislative Session, I followed this proposed
legislation:
HB 233: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
CREATING A WINTERTIME 10% OVERWEIGHT PERMIT FOR CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLES HAULING
GRAIN, HAY, LIVESTOCK, OR PRODUCTS NEEDED FOR THE OPERATION OF A FARM OR RANCH;
PROVIDING A FEE TO OBTAIN THE PERMIT; GRANTING RULEMAKING AUTHORITY TO THE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; AMENDING SECTIONS . . ." The purpose of this
proposed legislation is well described in the title of the bill. While it would
allow for increasing load limits during the winter months, December 1 through
March 7, there are possible risks involved in hazards to public health and
safety, and damage to the roadway. I monitored this proposed legislation.
SB 78: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
CLARIFYING THE MILL LEVY LIMIT FOR SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS; AMENDING . .
." This proposed legislation is basically a “house cleaning” bill to
clarify the language in the law and eliminate conflicting language with other
existing laws. I monitored this legislation.
SB 148: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
GENERALLY REVISING AND CLARIFYING LAWS RELATED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS;
RECOGNIZING ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT; REVISING SPECIFIC DOLLAR
AMOUNTS IN STATUTES; ELIMINATING ARCHAIC STATUTES; AMENDING SECTIONS . . . “
This proposed legislation is a general “house cleaning” bill that would update
and simplify the laws relating to local governments. I monitored this
legislation.
HB 48: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT REVISING
LAWS RELATING TO THE GROWTH THROUGH AGRICULTURE ACT; REVISING ELIGIBILITY AND
DISBURSEMENT GUIDELINES; ALLOWING THE USE OF GRANTS; GRANTING RULEMAKING
AUTHORITY; AMENDING . . ." This proposed legislation would clarify and
simplify the language in the Growth Through Agriculture Act. The revised
language would make it simpler to apply for a loan or grant through the Growth
Through Agriculture Program. I testified in support of this legislation.
SJ 11: A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF MONTANA REQUESTING THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
RESUME FUNDING OF THE MONTANA BIO-PRODUCT INNOVATION CENTERS. I monitored this
Senate Joint Resolution.
SB 214: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
INCREASING PENALTIES FOR THEFT OF A COMMONLY DOMESTICATED HOOFED ANIMAL AND FOR
ILLEGAL BRANDING OR ALTERING OR OBSCURING A BRAND; REQUIRING MANDATORY
COMMUNITY SERVICE IF A PRISON SENTENCE IS DEFERRED; PROVIDING FOR FORFEITURE OF
PROPERTY FOR THE THEFT OF A COMMONLY DOMESTICATED HOOFED ANIMAL AND FOR ILLEGAL
BRANDING OR ALTERING OR OBSCURING A BRAND; AMENDING . . ." I provided testimony in support
of this legislation.
SB 238: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
REPEALING THE TERMINATION DATE FOR FUNDING OF THE COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT
CENTER, THE GROWTH THROUGH AGRICULTURE PROGRAM, THE RESEARCH AND
COMMERCIALIZATION PROGRAM, THE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER, THE SMALL
BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM, THE CERTIFIED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATIONS, THE MONTANA MANUFACTURING EXTENSION CENTER AT MONTANA STATE
UNIVERSITY-BOZEMAN, AND THE EXPORT TRADE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM; RETAINING THE
STATUTORY APPROPRIATION FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS; AMENDING . . ."
I provided testimony in support of this proposed legislation. The only opponent
that testified against this bill was the Governor’s Budget Office. The reason
the Governor’s Budget Office testified against this bill is because it
completely eliminates any Sunset date for the existing law and it potentially
increases FY 2010 – 2011 expenditures over the Governor’s Executive Budget. As
a matter of course, due to the many unknowns in the amount of General Fund that
will be available for expenditure over the next biennium, the Governor’s Budget
Office has been opposing any proposed legislation that increases General Fund
spending in excess of the Governor’s Executive Budget.
HB 6: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
IMPLEMENTING THE RENEWABLE RESOURCE GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAM; APPROPRIATING MONEY
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION FOR GRANTS UNDER THE
RENEWABLE RESOURCE GRANT AND LOAN PROGRAM; PRIORITIZING GRANTS AND AMOUNTS;
ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS FOR GRANTS; AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES." The
Richland County Conservation District had submitted a grant proposal for
$100,000.00 entitled the “LOWER YELLOWSTONE GROUND-WATER RESERVATION: WATER
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF BURIED CHANNEL AQUIFERS IN RICHLAND COUNTY, MONTANA. I
provided testimony in support of the Richland County Conservation District’s
grant application.
HB 2: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
APPROPRIATING MONEY TO VARIOUS STATE AGENCIES FOR THE BIENNIUM ENDING JUNE 30,
2011; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." Leslie Messer, Executive Director
of the Richland Economic Development Corporation, provided testimony in support
of that portion of the Department of Commerce’s FY 2010 – 2011 Budget request
that had to do with economic development programs.
HB 238: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
ESTABLISHING A STATE TEEN DRIVER SAFETY DAY AS AN OFFICIAL DAY OF OBSERVANCE IN
SB 215: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
REMOVING FROM THE ENUMERATION OF COUNTY CHARGES THE REFERENCE TO THE COUNTY'S
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ONE-HALF OF A COUNTY ATTORNEY'S SALARY; AND AMENDING SECTION
7-6-2426, MCA." I provided testimony in support of this proposed
legislation.
SB 222: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
REVISING PROVISIONS RELATED TO REQUIRED FOUR-LANE HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION ALONG
U.S. HIGHWAY 2; REMOVING THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE DEPARTMENT SEEK FEDERAL
FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE A STATE MATCH; REMOVING THE
PROHIBITION ON EXPENDING RESOURCES THAT WOULD JEOPARDIZE FUTURE HIGHWAY
PROJECTS; AND AMENDING SECTION 60-2-133, MCA." This proposed legislation
would make the process easier for the State of
SB 225: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT
INCREASING THE ALLOWABLE GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT PER AXLE FOR FARM VEHICLES
TRANSPORTING SUGAR BEETS WITHIN A 50-MILE RADIUS OF THE HARVESTED FIELD BETWEEN
SEPTEMBER 15 AND DECEMBER 1; AND AMENDING SECTION 61-10-144,MCA." The
purpose of this proposed legislation is well described in the title of the
bill. While it would allow for increasing load limits during the sugar beet
harvest. While there are some advantages to this bill, there are also possible
risks involved in hazards to public health and safety, and damage to the roadway.
I monitored this proposed legislation.
HB 20: A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT CREATING
A WEATHERIZATION ACCOUNT; ALLOCATING TO THE ACCOUNT A PERCENTAGE OF THE OIL AND
NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION TAXES; AMENDING SECTIONS 15-36-331, 90-4-201, AND 90-4-215,
MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE." This proposed legislation would
take 5% of the state portion of the oil and gas production tax and create a
weatherization account in the state special revenue fund. I monitored this
legislation.